EHR Selector Feature Summary |
Description |
Why It's Important |
- FAST, NO WAITING
Real-time, no waiting for e-mailed reports;
Return to EHR Selector |
Users interact directly with the EHR selection software, not simply fill in a form, submit it and wait for an email. With the EHR Selector, all reports are instantaneous. |
It's not convenient to run scenarios or work with selectors that don't provide immediate feedback. |
- User-defined Profiles allow users to model current and future EHR needs, and easily switch between them.
Return to EHR Selector |
Global profiles available for some practice specialties, for deployment preference (web-based vs. in-office) for GUI preference and more, allow users novices to make expert assertions of multiple criteria in one click.
User-defined profiles allow you to select an EHR based on today's needs, and then check to see if the product selected will be flexible enough to meet tomorrow's needs as well. |
It takes time to get up the EHR 'learning curve', but the even a novice can immediately make expert assertions using the new Global Profile feature. |
|
Return to EHR Selector
|
Almost 40 KEY features of all EHR solutions are independently verified before any EHR vendor profile goes live. This results in better selection accuracy and minimizes 'vaporware'. For a list of the individual vetted items on the EHR Selector - Click Here
|
Independent 'vetting' of EHR developer claims is unique to this product. This is in addition to CCHIT-certification of EHRs. |
|
Return to EHR Selector
|
In addition to CCHIT certification, there are 374 other, practical criteria useful in picking successful EHRs. These are determined by our founder, Dr. Caroline Samuels, a practicing physicians and our partner organizations, like AGA and others. |
The EHR Selector leverages the experience of many clinical practices that have already deployed successful EHR solutions. |
|
Return to EHR Selector
|
Supports the needs of most practice specialties, including 19 specific ones, and and other specialty category.
The number of practice specialties is being increased to 39 in the next software release. |
No matter what our specialty, this tool will help you select and EHR that fits your needs. |
|
Return to EHR Selector |
Our revenue model is simple, a user pays a small subscription fee, and an EHR developer pays a small vetting fee. That it. No kickbacks from EHR developers if you select their systems. No other revenues support the MSP EHR Selector.
MSP is not a paid agent of any EHR developer. Some competitors offering 'free' EHR Selectors are. |
No conflicts of interest here.
You can trust MSP, just as our partner organizations do! In fact, that is why several of them choose to partner with us. |
- Our 3-vendor side-by-side summary clearly shows how one EHR system compares to another.
Return to EHR Selector |
We use an honest, verifiable, direct-match selection algorithm, and don't believe in 'matrix weighted' approaches.
The problem with matrix weighting is that it biases the position of one EHR developer over another, when BOTH meet all of the user-specified conditions asserted.
Who determines the weight of each vendor's features? Often its the EHR developer and the EHR Selector vendor, who may also takes a 'Finder's Fee' if their Selector picks certain vendors. You never really know if the selection is fair, because you don't know what money is changing hands based on the EHR developer selected. |
Even if matrix-weighted systems were impartial, they would base a selection on hidden information and assumptions about what is important, that the physician would not be aware of. That would make them unverifiable by the Selector user.
It also makes EHR developers unhappy, because no user calls the developer first whose 'weight' put them at the bottom of the list, even though they meet all the same criteria as the developer at the top of the list. |
|
Return to EHR Selector |
EHR Solutions available include:
ASP (web-based) or in-office deployment; template/picklist, dictation/voice recognition, handwriting/recognition, scanning/OCR/ICR approaches supporting a wide range of practice sizes, number of offices & budgets. |
We encourage EHR developers of all persuasions to subscribe their EHR solutions to the MSP EHR Selector. Several developers subscribe more than one of their EHR solutions to the Selector. |
|
Return to EHR Selector |
Many physicians find the "E"-HR word to be unfamiliar and scary. The criteria we have included on the EHR Selector will help those picking an EHR to get up the learning curve because we have included numerous Help screens and an integrated IT Terminology Glossary & links to other web-based supplemental learning resources. |
None of the information is unique, but if not wasting time exploring other webs sites all over the Internet is important to you, this is a good place to start because we have consolidated a lot of the information you need and provided links directly to it (from the Glossary) |
- INCLUDES CONTRACT ISSUES
Covers important acceptance testing, training, support and other contract issues.
Return to EHR Selector |
Getting the EHR Purchase Agreement & Terms right is also important. The EHR Selector includes SOME of the key issues and helps identify others that you will have to negotiate with the EHR developer separately. |
Purchase Agreement Terms are always unique. Start with a good boilerplate then PRINT the EHR EHR Feature Summary from your final EHR selection and append it to your RFQ or Purchase Agreement as a set of functional requirements that your EHR must provide. |
|
|
|